PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
13.67%
Net income growth of 13.67% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
11.66%
D&A growth of 11.66% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-67.77%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.66%
Negative yoy SBC while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-9.70%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
68.27%
AR growth of 68.27% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
51.09%
Inventory growth of 51.09% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-107.94%
Negative yoy AP while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
41.32%
Growth of 41.32% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-100.47%
Both negative yoy, with JD at -135.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.73%
Some CFO growth while JD is negative at -112.26%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -1753.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-194.82%
Negative yoy acquisition while JD stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
63.64%
Purchases growth of 63.64% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
147.14%
Liquidation growth of 147.14% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
134.00%
Growth well above JD's 169.77%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
23.67%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. JD's 156.39%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
40.31%
Debt repayment well below JD's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.