226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.51%
Some net income increase while JD is negative at -16.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
16.28%
Some D&A expansion while JD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-22.10%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.34%
Both cut yoy SBC, with JD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
206.38%
Working capital change of 206.38% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-473.89%
AR is negative yoy while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
161.90%
Inventory growth of 161.90% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
1929.35%
AP growth of 1929.35% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
136.69%
Growth of 136.69% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-244.68%
Negative yoy while JD is 172.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
75.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of JD's 500.24%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-23.05%
Negative yoy CapEx while JD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-307.56%
Negative yoy acquisition while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-308.51%
Negative yoy purchasing while JD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-54.43%
We reduce yoy sales while JD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
32.79%
We have some outflow growth while JD is negative at -146.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-121.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with JD at -157.46%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
71.83%
Debt repayment growth of 71.83% while JD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.