PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.75%
Net income growth above 1.5x JMIA's 11.49%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
13.48%
Some D&A expansion while JMIA is negative at -1.06%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-36.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-12.03%
Negative yoy SBC while JMIA is 42.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-135.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JMIA at -65.59%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
29.36%
AR growth while JMIA is negative at -44.93%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-480.21%
Negative yoy inventory while JMIA is 40765.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-57.54%
Negative yoy AP while JMIA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-111.92%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JMIA at -74.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-102.05%
Both negative yoy, with JMIA at -17.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-41.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JMIA at -87.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-48.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with JMIA at -114.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1370.34%
Negative yoy acquisition while JMIA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
9.06%
Some yoy expansion while JMIA is negative at -102.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
61.40%
Liquidation growth of 61.40% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
48.70%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. JMIA's 884.09%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
10.83%
We have mild expansions while JMIA is negative at -38.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-9.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while JMIA is 54.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.