PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-126.84%
Negative net income growth while JMIA stands at 18.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-8.41%
Negative yoy D&A while JMIA is 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
44.77%
Some yoy growth while JMIA is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-11.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with JMIA at -29.85%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-285.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JMIA at -630.77%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
76.88%
AR growth while JMIA is negative at -337.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-36.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with JMIA at -335.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-217.41%
Both negative yoy AP, with JMIA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-144.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JMIA at -393.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
175.03%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. JMIA's 353.66%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-112.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with JMIA at -18.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
21.04%
Lower CapEx growth vs. JMIA's 62.38%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-1564.30%
Negative yoy acquisition while JMIA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
78.66%
Some yoy expansion while JMIA is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
81.49%
Below 50% of JMIA's 8863.75%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-50.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while JMIA is 6909.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
107.20%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. JMIA's 1663.35%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
52.14%
We repay more while JMIA is negative at -26.83%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.