PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x JMIA's 0.92%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.86%
D&A growth well above JMIA's 8.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
2.30%
Deferred tax of 2.30% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
60.28%
SBC growth while JMIA is negative at -9.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
55.30%
Well above JMIA's 101.79% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-348.48%
AR is negative yoy while JMIA is 17.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-48.81%
Negative yoy inventory while JMIA is 41.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
139.43%
AP growth of 139.43% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
76.11%
Growth well above JMIA's 123.74%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-30.08%
Both negative yoy, with JMIA at -109.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
421.33%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x JMIA's 22.70%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-5.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with JMIA at -122.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
95.92%
Acquisition growth of 95.92% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
81.35%
Purchases growth of 81.35% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-88.54%
Both yoy lines are negative, with JMIA at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
34.49%
We have some outflow growth while JMIA is negative at -37.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-1433.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with JMIA at -43.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-274.82%
Both yoy lines negative, with JMIA at -167.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while JMIA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.