PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1041.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x JMIA's 35.61%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-12.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with JMIA at -4.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
85.98%
Deferred tax of 85.98% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-15.31%
Negative yoy SBC while JMIA is 140.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-236.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JMIA is 167.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
117.31%
AR growth well above JMIA's 113.70%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-88.33%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with JMIA at -199.20%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-214.33%
Both negative yoy AP, with JMIA at -32.29%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-178.72%
Negative yoy usage while JMIA is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-84.50%
Both negative yoy, with JMIA at -94.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-83.59%
Negative yoy CFO while JMIA is 63.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
14.37%
Lower CapEx growth vs. JMIA's 70.71%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-322.74%
Negative yoy acquisition while JMIA stands at 324.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-45.06%
Negative yoy purchasing while JMIA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-80.38%
We reduce yoy sales while JMIA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1.30%
We reduce yoy other investing while JMIA is 41.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.07%
We reduce yoy invests while JMIA stands at 53.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-20.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with JMIA at -19.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with JMIA at -121.05%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.