PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with JMIA at -145.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-15.46%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with JMIA at -12.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
35.93%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. JMIA's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-21.49%
Negative yoy SBC while JMIA is 28.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-173.18%
Negative yoy working capital usage while JMIA is 462.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
82.74%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. JMIA's 541.26%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-32.80%
Negative yoy inventory while JMIA is 62.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-203.62%
Negative yoy AP while JMIA is 742.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-98.87%
Negative yoy usage while JMIA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
10980.53%
Well above JMIA's 34.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-55.28%
Negative yoy CFO while JMIA is 140.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-2.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while JMIA is 62.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-520.47%
Negative yoy acquisition while JMIA stands at 175.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-351.72%
Negative yoy purchasing while JMIA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-11.22%
Both yoy lines are negative, with JMIA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-66.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while JMIA is 94.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-41.75%
We reduce yoy invests while JMIA stands at 32.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
83.04%
Debt repayment above 1.5x JMIA's 14.66%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.