PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
13.67%
Net income growth at 50-75% of JMIA's 19.15%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
11.66%
Some D&A expansion while JMIA is negative at -18.01%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-67.77%
Negative yoy deferred tax while JMIA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.66%
Both cut yoy SBC, with JMIA at -20.18%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-9.70%
Both reduce yoy usage, with JMIA at -221.58%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
68.27%
AR growth while JMIA is negative at -47.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
51.09%
Some inventory rise while JMIA is negative at -118.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-107.94%
Both negative yoy AP, with JMIA at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
41.32%
Some yoy usage while JMIA is negative at -940900100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-100.47%
Both negative yoy, with JMIA at -237.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.73%
Some CFO growth while JMIA is negative at -219.53%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with JMIA at -27.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-194.82%
Negative yoy acquisition while JMIA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
63.64%
Purchases growth of 63.64% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
147.14%
Liquidation growth of 147.14% while JMIA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
134.00%
We have some outflow growth while JMIA is negative at -214.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
23.67%
We have mild expansions while JMIA is negative at -221.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
40.31%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of JMIA's 52.61%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.