PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.05%
Net income growth similar to MELI's 5.87%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
6.77%
D&A growth well above MELI's 9.30%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-97.83%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
77.12%
SBC growth while MELI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
60.88%
Less working capital growth vs. MELI's 316.97%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-190.22%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MELI at -1228.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-231.75%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MELI at -8.54%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
178.05%
Lower AP growth vs. MELI's 412.45%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-19.41%
Negative yoy usage while MELI is 1036.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
55.34%
Well above MELI's 5.52%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
91.10%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of MELI's 137.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-28.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while MELI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-3641.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while MELI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-33.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while MELI stands at 54.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
47.87%
We have some liquidation growth while MELI is negative at -32.88%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
6.68%
We have some outflow growth while MELI is negative at -0.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-32.28%
We reduce yoy invests while MELI stands at 40.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-940.43%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MELI is 110.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.