PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.64%
Net income growth under 50% of MELI's 607.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.89%
Less D&A growth vs. MELI's 31.54%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
139.88%
Well above MELI's 16.49% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-10.09%
Negative yoy SBC while MELI is 7525.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-210.64%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MELI is 130.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
71.25%
AR growth well above MELI's 102.76%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
153.26%
Some inventory rise while MELI is negative at -44.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-192.76%
Both negative yoy AP, with MELI at -101.25%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-164.02%
Negative yoy usage while MELI is 491.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-155.02%
Negative yoy while MELI is 95.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-88.80%
Negative yoy CFO while MELI is 297.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
11.87%
Some CapEx rise while MELI is negative at -17.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-253.17%
Negative yoy acquisition while MELI stands at 98.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-233.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with MELI at -19.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
36.38%
We have some liquidation growth while MELI is negative at -37.03%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-7.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with MELI at -3003.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-127.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with MELI at -81.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-18.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MELI is 79.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.