PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-327.96%
Negative net income growth while SE stands at 69.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.61%
Negative yoy D&A while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
10.50%
Deferred tax of 10.50% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-10.50%
Negative yoy SBC while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
133.52%
Working capital change of 133.52% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-78.28%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-108.09%
Negative yoy inventory while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
120.07%
AP growth of 120.07% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
139.93%
Growth of 139.93% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
107.17%
Some yoy increase while SE is negative at -87.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
150.05%
Some CFO growth while SE is negative at -25.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-11.68%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-32.46%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
53.12%
Purchases growth of 53.12% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
67.53%
Liquidation growth of 67.53% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
32.46%
Growth well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
866.28%
Investing outflow well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-8621.45%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
37.57%
Issuance growth of 37.57% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.