PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-77.50%
Negative net income growth while SE stands at 69.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
34.42%
D&A growth of 34.42% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
354.73%
Deferred tax of 354.73% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-3.20%
Negative yoy SBC while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-194.63%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-29.06%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
166.84%
Inventory growth of 166.84% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-200.25%
Negative yoy AP while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-163.83%
Negative yoy usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
73.64%
Some yoy increase while SE is negative at -87.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-152.73%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SE at -25.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
29.26%
CapEx growth of 29.26% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
78.93%
Acquisition growth of 78.93% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-12.49%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-17.02%
We reduce yoy sales while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SE is 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-201.05%
We reduce yoy invests while SE stands at 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-47306.08%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-48.54%
Negative yoy issuance while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.