PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.46%
Negative net income growth while SE stands at 69.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.74%
D&A growth of 5.74% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
45.95%
Deferred tax of 45.95% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-2.55%
Negative yoy SBC while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-160.23%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
171.19%
AR growth of 171.19% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
154.93%
Inventory growth of 154.93% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-185.00%
Negative yoy AP while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.97%
Negative yoy usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
44.46%
Some yoy increase while SE is negative at -87.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-146.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SE at -25.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
66.91%
CapEx growth of 66.91% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-194.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
49.21%
Purchases growth of 49.21% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.38%
Liquidation growth of 18.38% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
83.24%
Growth well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
69.18%
Investing outflow well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-16.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.