PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-108.54%
Negative net income growth while SE stands at 69.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.00%
D&A growth of 8.00% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
126.25%
Deferred tax of 126.25% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
30.13%
SBC growth of 30.13% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
106.73%
Working capital change of 106.73% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-128.94%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-105.61%
Negative yoy inventory while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
98.16%
AP growth of 98.16% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
2815.79%
Growth of 2815.79% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-6.93%
Both negative yoy, with SE at -87.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
137.10%
Some CFO growth while SE is negative at -25.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.61%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-43.69%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-43.43%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
16.19%
Liquidation growth of 16.19% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-135.59%
We reduce yoy other investing while SE is 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-49.47%
We reduce yoy invests while SE stands at 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-59.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.