PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
682.93%
Net income growth above 1.5x SE's 69.84%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
15.47%
D&A growth of 15.47% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-1090.91%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
16.01%
SBC growth of 16.01% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
494.14%
Working capital change of 494.14% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-891.20%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-126.96%
Negative yoy inventory while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
441.50%
AP growth of 441.50% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
301.33%
Growth of 301.33% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-51.59%
Both negative yoy, with SE at -87.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
301.87%
Some CFO growth while SE is negative at -25.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
15.22%
CapEx growth of 15.22% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-5800.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
19.11%
Purchases growth of 19.11% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
4.25%
Liquidation growth of 4.25% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
495.83%
Growth well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
20.70%
Investing outflow well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-5.88%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.