PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-54.81%
Negative net income growth while SE stands at 69.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.88%
D&A growth of 4.88% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-69.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.53%
Negative yoy SBC while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-158.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
158.68%
AR growth of 158.68% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
152.56%
Inventory growth of 152.56% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-191.17%
Negative yoy AP while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-85.01%
Negative yoy usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-7.43%
Both negative yoy, with SE at -87.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-144.85%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SE at -25.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-22.73%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-4.30%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
15.15%
Liquidation growth of 15.15% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
64.21%
Growth well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-9.61%
We reduce yoy invests while SE stands at 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.70%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.