PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-246.83%
Negative net income growth while SE stands at 69.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.44%
D&A growth of 12.44% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-451.02%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.58%
Negative yoy SBC while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
384.76%
Working capital change of 384.76% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-21.07%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-1018.48%
Negative yoy inventory while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
601.16%
AP growth of 601.16% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
22.07%
Growth of 22.07% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
6.32%
Some yoy increase while SE is negative at -87.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
104.87%
Some CFO growth while SE is negative at -25.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-6.82%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1183.58%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.25%
Purchases growth of 56.25% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
49.58%
Liquidation growth of 49.58% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
106.39%
Growth well above SE's 36.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-29.41%
We reduce yoy invests while SE stands at 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
7.37%
Debt repayment growth of 7.37% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.