PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
13.77%
Net income growth similar to SE's 13.07%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
4.08%
Less D&A growth vs. SE's 458.15%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
291.37%
Deferred tax of 291.37% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-8.04%
Negative yoy SBC while SE is 494.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
164.02%
Working capital change of 164.02% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-111.44%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-0.37%
Negative yoy inventory while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
44.06%
AP growth of 44.06% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
148.57%
Growth of 148.57% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-18.97%
Negative yoy while SE is 132.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
15.29%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SE's 60.84%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-3.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-12.70%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-651.02%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
18.31%
Liquidation growth of 18.31% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
180.61%
We have some outflow growth while SE is negative at -142.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-106.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -142.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-68.59%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.