PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.99%
Some net income increase while SE is negative at -26.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.81%
Some D&A expansion while SE is negative at -54.29%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-34.96%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.96%
SBC growth while SE is negative at -61.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
4690.85%
Slight usage while SE is negative at -154.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
51.63%
AR growth while SE is negative at -2549.52%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-23.40%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SE at -161.75%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
76.73%
AP growth of 76.73% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1247.26%
Some yoy usage while SE is negative at -119.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
70.25%
Some yoy increase while SE is negative at -3.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
91.87%
Some CFO growth while SE is negative at -86.96%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-11.37%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 44.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
66.09%
Acquisition growth of 66.09% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
48.92%
Purchases growth of 48.92% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-1.32%
We reduce yoy sales while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-25.58%
We reduce yoy other investing while SE is 32.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
35.89%
Investing outflow well above SE's 32.44%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
13.77%
Debt repayment growth of 13.77% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.