PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.82%
Some net income increase while SE is negative at -39.95%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.20%
D&A growth well above SE's 9.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
44.41%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SE's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
48.04%
SBC growth well above SE's 83.63%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
193.27%
Less working capital growth vs. SE's 1542.14%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-326.15%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SE at -646.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-148.28%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SE at -147.21%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
207.11%
AP growth well above SE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
190.34%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SE's 36548.99%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-177.06%
Negative yoy while SE is 63444.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
572.52%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SE's 233.28%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-9.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -6.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-29.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 99.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-28.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-30.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-38.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -29236.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-100.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -11.34%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-50.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -3194.48%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.