PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.75%
Some net income increase while SE is negative at -6.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.48%
Less D&A growth vs. SE's 204.16%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-36.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-12.03%
Negative yoy SBC while SE is 158.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-135.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SE at -57.92%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
29.36%
AR growth while SE is negative at -50.26%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-480.21%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SE at -44.57%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-57.54%
Negative yoy AP while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-111.92%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SE at -17.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-102.05%
Negative yoy while SE is 3.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-41.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SE at -0.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-48.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -306.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1370.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -12555.63%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
9.06%
Purchases growth of 9.06% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
61.40%
Liquidation growth of 61.40% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
48.70%
We have some outflow growth while SE is negative at -27.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
10.83%
We have mild expansions while SE is negative at -27.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-9.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.