PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.24%
Some net income increase while SE is negative at -61.13%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.86%
Less D&A growth vs. SE's 14.98%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
2.30%
Deferred tax of 2.30% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
60.28%
SBC growth well above SE's 36.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
55.30%
Working capital change of 55.30% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-348.48%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-48.81%
Negative yoy inventory while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
139.43%
AP growth of 139.43% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
76.11%
Growth of 76.11% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-30.08%
Negative yoy while SE is 212.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
421.33%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SE's 32.91%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-5.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
95.92%
Acquisition growth of 95.92% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
81.35%
Purchases growth of 81.35% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-88.54%
We reduce yoy sales while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
34.49%
Growth well above SE's 16.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-1433.11%
We reduce yoy invests while SE stands at 16.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-274.82%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.