PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1041.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x SE's 108.17%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-12.31%
Negative yoy D&A while SE is 1498.41%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
85.98%
Well above SE's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-15.31%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SE at -71.83%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-236.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
117.31%
AR growth while SE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-88.33%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-214.33%
Both negative yoy AP, with SE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-178.72%
Negative yoy usage while SE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-84.50%
Both negative yoy, with SE at -70.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-83.59%
Negative yoy CFO while SE is 89.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
14.37%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SE's 89.07%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-322.74%
Negative yoy acquisition while SE stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-45.06%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-80.38%
We reduce yoy sales while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1.30%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -155.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-46.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -1407.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-20.72%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.