PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.54%
Net income growth under 50% of SE's 26.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.92%
Some D&A expansion while SE is negative at -4.79%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-22.41%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.41%
Less SBC growth vs. SE's 291.66%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
404.44%
Working capital change of 404.44% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
130.01%
AR growth of 130.01% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
227.10%
Inventory growth of 227.10% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
286.10%
AP growth of 286.10% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-51.71%
Negative yoy usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
65.76%
Well above SE's 26.01%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
100.15%
Some CFO growth while SE is negative at -53.14%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 62.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
76.61%
Acquisition growth of 76.61% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-98.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.56%
Liquidation growth of 12.56% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
4.57%
We have some outflow growth while SE is negative at -18.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-7.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with SE at -18.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
18.60%
Debt repayment growth of 18.60% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.