PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.28%
Net income growth under 50% of SE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.03%
Some D&A expansion while SE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
16.31%
Deferred tax of 16.31% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
35.50%
SBC growth while SE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
38.44%
Working capital change of 38.44% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-159.96%
AR is negative yoy while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-273.70%
Negative yoy inventory while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
153.23%
AP growth of 153.23% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-67.32%
Negative yoy usage while SE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-18.69%
Negative yoy while SE is 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.13%
Operating cash flow growth similar to SE's 32.17%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-18.06%
Negative yoy CapEx while SE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
127.75%
Acquisition growth of 127.75% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-329.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while SE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
134.55%
Liquidation growth of 134.55% while SE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1046.52%
We reduce yoy other investing while SE is 14.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-23.94%
We reduce yoy invests while SE stands at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-257.48%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SE is 29.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.