226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-485.71%
Negative net income growth indicates shrinking profitability. Benjamin Graham would label it a concern unless explained by temporary factors.
10.32%
D&A 10-15% yoy – Potential drag on reported income. Howard Marks would question if ROI on assets justifies it.
-47.62%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
-5.70%
Negative yoy SBC growth reduces new equity issuance. Benjamin Graham would verify that enough talent investment remains for growth.
322.22%
Working capital above 30% yoy – Very high. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether the buildup is strategic or signals inefficiency.
40.76%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
-1853.33%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
1329.87%
AP above 30% yoy – High. Philip Fisher would suspect possible cash strain or very aggressive use of supplier credit.
16.28%
10-20% yoy – Noticeable. Peter Lynch would check if expansions or new divisions explain the bigger outflow.
-38.08%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
57.73%
Operating cash flow growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would ensure it stems from sustainable operations, not just working capital shifts.
-21.40%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
99.32%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
53.46%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on the risk/return of tying up major liquidity in investments.
-29.02%
A negative yoy figure indicates fewer or no liquidations compared to last year. Benjamin Graham would check if holding long-term investments is wise or missing near-term cash opportunities.
94.24%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether these “other” items overshadow core expansions.
25.14%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
12.07%
Debt repayment 10-15% yoy – Good. Seth Klarman would see a moderate risk reduction if top-line supports these payments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.