PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.20%
Similar revenue growth to ETSY's 6.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
7.13%
Cost growth 50-75% of ETSY's 11.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
4.99%
Similar gross profit growth to ETSY's 4.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-1.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.63%
Similar R&D growth to ETSY's 15.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
8.27%
G&A growth less than half of ETSY's 21.24%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
17.11%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of ETSY's 29.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
1820.00%
Other expenses growth while ETSY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.28%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of ETSY's 23.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
9.12%
Total costs growth less than half of ETSY's 18.56%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.64%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x ETSY's 0.54%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.17%
D&A growth while ETSY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.92%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-926.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-34.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.26%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-26.28%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.41%
Share count reduction below 50% of ETSY's 0.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.20%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ETSY's 0.44%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.