PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.37%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x ETSY's 9.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
13.66%
Similar cost growth to ETSY's 17.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
5.96%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ETSY's 5.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-4.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.42%
R&D growth less than half of ETSY's 12.86%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
6.14%
Similar G&A growth to ETSY's 7.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
10.74%
Marketing expense growth 1.1-1.25x ETSY's 8.92%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
-36.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.42%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of ETSY's 9.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
10.78%
Similar total costs growth to ETSY's 12.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.39%
Interest expense growth less than half of ETSY's 8.53%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.94%
D&A growth less than half of ETSY's 30.56%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
1.38%
EBITDA growth while ETSY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.37%
Operating income growth while ETSY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-169.23%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
92.22%
Tax expense growth while ETSY reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.52%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.23%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.41%
Share count reduction below 50% of ETSY's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.20%
Diluted share increase while ETSY reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.