PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.73%
Revenue growth 50-75% of GLBE's 13.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
38.73%
Cost growth above 1.5x GLBE's 10.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-22.59%
Gross profit decline while GLBE shows 16.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-28.14%
Margin decline while GLBE shows 2.65% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.14%
R&D growth above 1.5x GLBE's 9.22%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
12.82%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x GLBE's 11.39%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
16.93%
Marketing expense growth while GLBE reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-99.20%
Other expenses reduction while GLBE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.75%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.21%
Total costs growth while GLBE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.62%
Interest expense reduction while GLBE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-41.41%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.16%
Operating income growth below 50% of GLBE's 154.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.31%
Operating margin decline while GLBE shows 148.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.79%
Pre-tax income decline while GLBE shows 166.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while GLBE shows 158.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Tax expense reduction while GLBE shows 84.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.05%
Net income growth below 50% of GLBE's 158.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.56%
Net margin decline while GLBE shows 151.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.56%
EPS growth below 50% of GLBE's 156.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.66%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GLBE's 154.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of GLBE's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GLBE's 3.69%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.