PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.73%
Revenue growth below 50% of JD's 18.46%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
38.73%
Cost growth above 1.5x JD's 18.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-22.59%
Gross profit decline while JD shows 18.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-28.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18.14%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x JD's 14.67%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
12.82%
G&A growth less than half of JD's 28.23%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
16.93%
Marketing expense growth less than half of JD's 164.78%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-99.20%
Other expenses reduction while JD shows 9.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.75%
Operating expenses reduction while JD shows 54.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.21%
Total costs growth less than half of JD's 23.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.62%
Interest expense reduction while JD shows 7.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-41.41%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.16%
Operating income growth while JD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.50%
Other expenses reduction while JD shows 169.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.18%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
6.05%
Net income growth while JD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.56%
EPS growth while JD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.66%
Diluted EPS growth while JD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count increase while JD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Diluted share increase while JD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.