226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Specialty Retail median of 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
13.66%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Specialty Retail median of 1.50%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Specialty Retail median of 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.00%
Margin decline while Specialty Retail median is -0.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
1.42%
R&D change of 1.42% versus flat Specialty Retail spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
6.14%
G&A change of 6.14% versus flat Specialty Retail overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
10.74%
Marketing expense change of 10.74% versus flat Specialty Retail spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-36.05%
Other expenses reduction while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
6.42%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Specialty Retail median of 1.57%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
10.78%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Specialty Retail median of 1.11%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
3.39%
Interest expense change of 3.39% versus flat Specialty Retail costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
6.94%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Specialty Retail median of 1.15%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
1.38%
EBITDA growth while Specialty Retail declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-8.15%
EBITDA margin decline while Specialty Retail median is -3.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
2.37%
Operating income growth while Specialty Retail declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-7.25%
Operating margin decline while Specialty Retail median is -3.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-169.23%
Other expenses reduction while Specialty Retail median is 1.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.90%
Pre-tax income decline while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-17.46%
Pre-tax margin decline while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
92.22%
Tax expense growth while Specialty Retail reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-18.70%
Net income decline while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.35%
Net margin decline while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.52%
EPS decline while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-19.23%
Diluted EPS decline while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.41%
Share count change of 0.41% versus stable Specialty Retail. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.20%
Diluted share change of 0.20% versus stable Specialty Retail. Walter Schloss would verify approach.