743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.54%
Revenue growth 0-5% indicates modest expansion. Howard Marks would investigate if this reflects market maturity.
-4.60%
Negative cost of revenue growth (cost reduction) can be positive but verify quality impact. Benjamin Graham would examine if cost cuts are sustainable.
6.76%
Gross profit growth 5-10% indicates modest gains. Howard Marks would investigate if growth can accelerate.
2.13%
Gross margin improvement 1-3% reflects positive momentum. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
7.03%
R&D growth 5-10% suggests significant investment. Howard Marks would investigate if returns justify increased spending.
-58.19%
Negative G&A growth (overhead reduction) needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on operations.
0.08%
Marketing expense growth 0-5% reflects moderate investment. Benjamin Graham would check if spending drives revenue.
-776.92%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-18.33%
Negative operating expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-14.62%
Negative total costs growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
17.81%
Interest expense growth above 10% signals concerning debt expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification.
-5.73%
Negative D&A growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine asset reduction strategy.
5.82%
EBITDA growth 4-8% suggests moderate improvement. Benjamin Graham would check quality of earnings.
1.23%
EBITDA margin growth 1-3% reflects healthy improvement. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
8.44%
Operating income growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
3.73%
Operating margin growth 3-5% shows strong cost control. Peter Lynch would examine pricing power.
-30.10%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
51.68%
Pre-tax income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
45.09%
Pre-tax margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional cost management. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-44.13%
Negative tax expense growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
132.84%
Net income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional bottom-line expansion. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
122.73%
Net margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
131.52%
EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional shareholder value creation. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
132.97%
Diluted EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional value creation despite potential dilution. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-0.06%
Share count reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.