PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.85
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.24
1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many industries. Peter Lynch would want stable cash flows to avoid dipping below 1.
0.64
0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.
5.99
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
0.31
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.