PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.57
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.55
1.5–2.0 – Good coverage. Seth Klarman might check if seasonal factors affect the ratio significantly.
0.92
0.7–1.0 – Decent. Peter Lynch might see partial reliance on future cash inflows to fully cover obligations.
5.60
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
0.37
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.