PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
171.25%
Net income growth above 20% – Outstanding. Warren Buffett would verify whether this rise is driven by core operations or one-time items.
5.29%
D&A 5-10% yoy – Noticeable rise. Peter Lynch would hope new assets produce higher revenue to offset the expense.
219.33%
Deferred taxes above 30% yoy – Significant surge. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on what drives this big potential future tax burden.
-34.35%
Negative yoy SBC growth reduces new equity issuance. Benjamin Graham would verify that enough talent investment remains for growth.
-36.33%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
46.66%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
-39.66%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
-43.57%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
25.06%
20-30% yoy – Could tie up significant cash. Howard Marks would look at specific accounts causing the growth.
-138.57%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-28.58%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
-39.28%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
241.53%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
99.97%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on the risk/return of tying up major liquidity in investments.
-69.91%
A negative yoy figure indicates fewer or no liquidations compared to last year. Benjamin Graham would check if holding long-term investments is wise or missing near-term cash opportunities.
-99.96%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
-755.57%
A negative yoy shift suggests smaller outflows or net inflows if disposals exceed invests. Benjamin Graham would see a short-term FCF benefit unless growth is compromised.
7.03%
Debt repayment 5-10% yoy – Mild. Peter Lynch might look for catalysts to accelerate further paydowns or expansions.
591.99%
Issuance above 15% yoy – Significant equity raise. Philip Fisher would require a very compelling reason to risk heavy shareholder dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.