PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.91
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.35
1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many industries. Peter Lynch would want stable cash flows to avoid dipping below 1.
0.45
0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.
-16.67
Negative interest coverage suggests negative EBIT or an overbearing interest burden – a major red flag for Benjamin Graham.
0.13
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.