205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.38
2–3 – Solid buffer. Benjamin Graham might see this as prudent management of working capital.
1.89
1.5–2.0 – Good coverage. Seth Klarman might check if seasonal factors affect the ratio significantly.
0.41
0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.
6.04
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
0.72
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.