PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.50%
Negative net income growth while 0819.HK stands at 31.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
237.32%
D&A growth well above 0819.HK's 6.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.64%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 0819.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
134.79%
AR growth of 134.79% while 0819.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-68.10%
Negative yoy inventory while 0819.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-138.77%
Negative yoy usage while 0819.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
266.88%
Some yoy increase while 0819.HK is negative at -82.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
33.34%
Some CFO growth while 0819.HK is negative at -20.81%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-35.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with 0819.HK at -4.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 0819.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.80%
Growth well above 0819.HK's 126.24%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
28.93%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. 0819.HK's 107.94%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to 0819.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.