0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-74.23%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.82%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
21.61%
D&A growth of 21.61% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
2818.41%
SBC growth of 2818.41% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
129.69%
Working capital of 129.69% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.79%
Inventory growth of 44.79% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.47%
Growth of 198.47% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
457.97%
Under 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 7.11% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
381.08%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-46.61%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.55%
Growth of 148.55% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-74.24%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-6.15%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.