0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-57.73%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-57.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-513.63%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 20494.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-513.63%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-238.98%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 2936.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-239.53%
Negative EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 2911.42%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-239.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 2910.42%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
473.30%
OCF growth of 473.30% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
434.86%
FCF growth of 434.86% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-47.19%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-47.19%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-47.19%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
299.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
299.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
299.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-17.28%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-17.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-17.28%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.40%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.