PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-30.74%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
67.30%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 20494.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
67.30%
Positive operating income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
49.84%
Net income growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2936.69%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
49.69%
EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2911.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
49.69%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2910.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.41%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-116.64%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-63.43%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-63.43%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-63.43%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
67.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
67.31%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
67.31%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
56.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
56.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
56.93%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.99%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 17.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.