0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0259.HK's 20494.44%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.00%
Positive operating income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2911.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.23%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 2910.42%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.85%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-26.85%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-41.44%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
34.62%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
34.62%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-22.52%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
13.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
13.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-148.98%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.