0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0259.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
0.00%
Gross profit growth of 0.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
0.00%
Operating income growth of 0.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
-0.00%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
1.16%
EPS growth of 1.16% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
1.16%
Diluted EPS growth of 1.16% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-32.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-32.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-24.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
54.36%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 54.36% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
54.36%
Net income/share CAGR of 54.36% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
34.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 34.04% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.