0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.33%
Revenue growth of 2.33% while 0259.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
2.33%
Gross profit growth of 2.33% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
104.53%
EBIT growth of 104.53% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
104.53%
Operating income growth of 104.53% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
46.08%
Net income growth of 46.08% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
45.88%
EPS growth of 45.88% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
45.88%
Diluted EPS growth of 45.88% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.47%
OCF growth of 218.47% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
217.89%
FCF growth of 217.89% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-70.33%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-70.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
178.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 178.67% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
178.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 178.67% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-60.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
87.70%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 87.70% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
87.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 87.70% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
89.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 89.51% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.29%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.