PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 25.67%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 27.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.01%
EBIT growth of 0.01% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
0.00%
Positive operating income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
OCF growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 11.33%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.00%
FCF growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 27.16%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-40.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 25.59%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-52.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 25.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 25.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
257.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 11.26%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
394.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 11.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-60.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 11.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
75.39%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 254.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
28.87%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 254.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
85.67%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 254.81%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0259.HK's 244.99%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.