0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
50.07%
Revenue growth of 50.07% while 0259.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-10.89%
Negative gross profit growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1059.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1059.06%
Negative operating income growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-36.72%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-34.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.36%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-118.85%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-55.48%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 25.59%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-64.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 25.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
21.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0259.HK's 25.59%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
85.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 11.26%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
72.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 11.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
55.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 11.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
83.18%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 254.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
51.38%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 254.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
60.94%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 254.81%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.39%
SG&A growth of 32.39% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.