PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 1.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0259.HK is at 1490.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-512.90%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-512.90%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-71.49%
Share reduction while 0259.HK is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-71.49%
Reduced diluted shares while 0259.HK is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 26.84%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
25.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 0259.HK's 26.84%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
327.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 26.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-1.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 38.25%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.04%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 38.25%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-55.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 38.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-18.02%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-70.56%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-37.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.