0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.01%
Revenue growth of 30.01% while 0259.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-29.38%
Negative gross profit growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1377.55%
EBIT growth of 1377.55% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
1247.29%
Operating income growth of 1247.29% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
342.74%
Net income growth of 342.74% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
175.79%
EPS growth of 175.79% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
175.79%
Diluted EPS growth of 175.79% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
85.89%
Share change of 85.89% while 0259.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
85.89%
Diluted share change of 85.89% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.08%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-703.40%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
9.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0259.HK's 26.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
106.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 26.84%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
276.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 26.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
59.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 38.25%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-120.26%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 38.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
39.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to 0259.HK's 38.25%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
177.06%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
165.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
437.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-241.39%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.