0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17045.22%
Revenue growth of 17045.22% while 0259.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
4822.56%
Gross profit growth of 4822.56% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
100.00%
EBIT growth of 100.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
323.00%
Operating income growth of 323.00% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
237.25%
Net income growth of 237.25% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
913.95%
EPS growth of 913.95% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
913.95%
Diluted EPS growth of 913.95% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
18.11%
Share change of 18.11% while 0259.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
18.11%
Diluted share change of 18.11% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
698.72%
OCF growth of 698.72% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-57.51%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6634.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 47.93%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
18313.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 47.93%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22601.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 47.93%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
186.90%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 64.06%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
365.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 64.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
10.46%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0259.HK's 64.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
193.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
316.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
859.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
367.08%
SG&A growth of 367.08% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.