0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.05%
Revenue growth of 39.05% while 0259.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
12.90%
Gross profit growth of 12.90% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-9.94%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-81.41%
Negative operating income growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
251.72%
Net income growth of 251.72% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
251.20%
EPS growth of 251.20% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
251.20%
Diluted EPS growth of 251.20% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1004.54%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0259.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-119.58%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-155.91%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
22933.94%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
77546.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
20989.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-275.97%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-577.90%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-831.50%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
234.41%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1192.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
74.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.02%
Inventory is declining while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
26.81%
Asset growth of 26.81% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-7.19%
We have a declining book value while 0259.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
31.29%
Debt growth of 31.29% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.29%
SG&A growth of 8.29% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.